![]() ![]() ![]() J Exp Med 73(2):249īauer AW, Kirby WM, Sherris JC, Turck M (1966) Antibiotic susceptibility testing by a standardized single disk method. J Hazard Mater 129(1–3):216–222īaker Z, Harrison RW, Miller BF (1941) Action of synthetic detergents on the metabolism of bacteria. J Periodontal Res 52(3):497–504Īrutchelvan V, Kanakasabai V, Elangovan R, Nagarajan S, Muralikrishnan V (2006) Kinetics of high strength phenol degradation using Bacillus brevis. In the view of these results, the usage of appropriate bacterial cultures and the correct stabilization of the formulations are also critical elements in the development of microbial cleaner formulations.Īlkaya B, Laleman I, Keceli S, Ozcelik O, Cenk Haytac M, Teughels W (2017) Clinical effects of probiotics containing Bacillus species on gingivitis: a pilot randomized controlled trial. The anionic surfactants such as linear alkylbenzene sulfonic acid and sodium lauryl ether sulfate act as bacteriostatic on Bacillus spp. pneumoniae were the most sensitive bacteria while B. According to antagonistic activity results, the Gram-positive S. subtilis, which can be used in the microbial cleaner formulation, shows higher growth and viability at the neutral pH, and it passes into the death phase at pH 3. As a result, it was discovered that the B. subtilis was examined at different pH ranges for microbial cleaner formulation. In this study, the surfactants and other additives were investigated as biocidal or bacteriostatic against B. The quality of cleaning performance for the production of probiotic cleaners does not only depend on the potential of the bacterial strains used, but also on the chemical components of the formulations. as active substances are becoming increasingly common in probiotic cleaner formulation. ![]() Cleaning products containing live bacteria that form spores of Bacillus spp. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |